1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306
//! This is my solution for [Advent of Code - Day 14 - _Extended Polymerization_](https://adventofcode.com/2021/day/14)
//!
//! By the end of today I was thinking it was a lot like [`crate::day_6`], but I missed how
//! exponential it was when first reading, so implemented the naive versions for part one, but that
//! did not complete before it ran out of memory for part two. I ended up noting that each pair
//! would become two new pairs each step (or stay as the same pair if there was no insertion mapping
//! for that pair). This meant I could just track the counts of each pair in a given iteration, and
//! work out the next step by walking through the current pair counts and adding its count to each
//! of the pairs it maps to in the counts map for the next iteration.
//!
//! The types are pretty convoluted today, enough so that I aliased the Polymer as map of pairs ->
//! counts, and pair mapping of pair -> pairs when iterated into [`Polymer`] and [`PairMap`]
//! respectively. That said, whilst the types were complex, they were a great guide for what
//! transformations I needed to do at each step, and once I'd satisfied the type checker the
//! solutions just worked.
//!
//! There's quite a lot of moving parts today, mostly involved in building the internal
//! representation from the input, and converting the result into the required output.
//! [`parse_input`] takes the file, transforms the seed polymer into the required map of pair counts
//! using [`into_pair_counts`], and then takes the remaining lines and creates the PairMap. i.e. a
//! mapping of `AB -> C` becomes `('A', 'B') => [('A', 'C'), ('C', 'B')]` which means when there is
//! a pair `AB` the next iteration will instead have two pairs, `AC` and `CB`. [`intersperse`]
//! handles performing a single insertion cycle, and [`iterate`] recursively calls [`intersperse`]
//! for the required number of cycles. Finally [`summarise`] works out the counts of each of the
//! characters. With the current implementation we need to take the counts of both parts of each
//! pair to account for the first and last characters. This in itself involves some complex type
//! munging, so has been extracted to [`into_count_by`]. If I was building this again I'd consider
//! making a struct to hold the polymer, including caching the final character from the seed. This
//! would allow just counting the first character in each pair and adding 1 to the count that
//! matches the final character. As it is, this works and is quick enough that it's not worth the
//! effort.
use itertools::Itertools;
use std::collections::HashMap;
use std::fs;
/// The internal representation of polymer as the counts of the distinct consecutive pairs.
type Polymer = HashMap<(char, char), usize>;
/// The internal representation of the insertion map, that returns the two new pairs generated by
/// inserting the specified character.
type PairMap = HashMap<(char, char), Vec<(char, char)>>;
/// The entry point for running the solutions with the 'real' puzzle input.
///
/// - The puzzle input is expected to be at `<project_root>/res/day-14-input`
/// - It is expected this will be called by [`super::main()`] when the user elects to run day 14.
pub fn run() {
let contents = fs::read_to_string("res/day-14-input").expect("Failed to read file");
let (seed, mapping) = parse_input(&contents);
let polymer = iterate(&seed, 10, &mapping);
let (_, result) = summarise(&polymer);
println!("The max - min counts after 10 cycles = {}.", result);
let polymer2 = iterate(&polymer, 30, &mapping);
let (_, result2) = summarise(&polymer2);
let length = polymer_length(&polymer2);
println!(
"The max - min counts after 40 cycles = {}, total length {}.",
result2, length
)
}
/// Split a list of characters into the counts of all the consecutive pairs that exist. The hard
/// work is delegated to library functions [`slice::windows`] to give an iterator of the pairs
/// and [`Itertools::counts`] to reduce that to the required map.
fn into_pair_counts(polymer_chars: &Vec<char>) -> Polymer {
polymer_chars
.windows(2)
.map(|window| (window[0], window[1]))
.counts()
}
/// The types required to make today's solution work are pretty complex, so there is quite a lot of
/// work here to take a relatively simple input format into the complex format that makes the logic
/// efficient. A bunch of the tests need to convert intermediate polymer string representations into
/// the map of pair counts used internally, so this is delegated to [`into_pair_counts`].
fn parse_input(input: &String) -> (Polymer, PairMap) {
let mut lines = input.lines();
let seed = into_pair_counts(&lines.next().expect("Empty input").chars().collect());
// skip blank
lines.next();
let mapping: HashMap<(char, char), Vec<(char, char)>> = lines
.flat_map(|line| line.split_once(" -> "))
.flat_map(|(pair, insert)| {
let mut pair_chars = pair.chars();
pair_chars
.next()
.zip(pair_chars.next())
.zip(insert.chars().next())
})
.map(|(pair, c)| (pair, vec![(pair.0, c), (c, pair.1)]))
.collect();
(seed, mapping)
}
/// The name is a legacy from the naive solution where this was mapping each pair to the new pairs
/// and building the full polymer in order which failed as the final polymer had ~21 trillion
/// characters. This takes all the existing pairs and adds their counts to the pair(s) they map to
/// when the mapped character is inserted.
///
/// Consider the seed `BABABA`, in the internal representation this becomes `BA => 3, AB => 2`.
/// With the mapping `AB -> A` and `BA -> A` this would become `BAAABAAABAA` or `BA => 3, AA => 5,
/// AB => 2`. Because each pair mapping is independent, we can view the mapping as `AB => AA, AB`,
/// `BA => BA, AA`. So applying [`intersperse`] to the `BA => 3, AB => 2` polymer:
/// * `BA => 3` becomes `BA => 3, AA => 3`.
/// * The new map is empty so both are inserted with a count of 3.
/// * `AB => 2` becomes `AA => 2, AB => 2`.
/// * `AA` already exists with a count of 3, so these two are added to give `AA =>5`.
/// * `AB` isn't in the map, so it is inserted with a count of 2.
/// * This gives the expected `BA => 3, AA => 5, AB => 2` Polymer.
fn intersperse(polymer: &Polymer, mapping: &PairMap) -> Polymer {
let mut new = HashMap::new();
for (pair, count) in polymer {
if let Some(pairs) = mapping.get(&pair) {
pairs.iter().for_each(|p| {
new.insert(*p, new.get(p).unwrap_or(&0) + count);
})
} else {
// If a pair is not in the map it remains unchanged. This doesn't come up for the
// sample input, and I've not checked for the puzzle input, but it's easy enough to
// implement and keeps the compiler happy.
new.insert(*pair, new.get(pair).unwrap_or(&0) + count);
};
}
new
}
// Utility for counting the length of the polymer. Since they overlap, the two chars per pair and
// two pairs per char cancel out, but we need to add one to cover that the first and last character
// are each only in one pair.
fn polymer_length(polymer: &Polymer) -> usize {
polymer.values().sum::<usize>() + 1
}
/// Recursively apply [`intersperse`] the required number of times
fn iterate(seed: &Polymer, cycles: usize, mapping: &PairMap) -> Polymer {
if cycles == 0 {
return seed.clone();
}
iterate(&intersperse(seed, mapping), cycles - 1, mapping)
}
/// Reduce the pair mapping into a count of characters. This needs to be called twice once for each
/// element in the pair, to account for the first and last character that are each only in one pair.
/// The mapping parameter is to capture this difference, and maps a pair count entry from the
/// Polymer into the character this invocation cares about
fn into_count_by(
polymer: &Polymer,
mapping: for<'a> fn(&'a (&(char, char), &usize)) -> char,
) -> HashMap<char, usize> {
polymer
.iter()
// group by the mapping - the values are now `Vec<((char, char), usize)>
.into_grouping_map_by(mapping)
// sum just the counts
.fold(0, |acc, _, (_, &val)| acc + val)
// map the resulting HashMap to fix the references
.iter()
.map(|(&k, &v)| (k, v))
.collect()
}
/// This is responsible for converting the internal representation of a polymer into the data needed
/// to provide the puzzle solution. It also returns the intermediary hashmap so that this can be
/// verified in tests against the example provided in the specification.
fn summarise(polymer: &Polymer) -> (HashMap<char, usize>, usize) {
// Get the counts bases on the first ...
let starts: HashMap<char, usize> = into_count_by(polymer, |((a, _), _)| *a);
// ... and second character in the pair
let ends: HashMap<char, usize> = into_count_by(polymer, |((_, b), _)| *b);
// For each character take the maximum count from these two maps. The count for the starting
// character is one higher as it only appears in the start of the one pair it's in, and vice
// versa for the final character.
let counts: HashMap<char, usize> = starts
.iter()
.map(|(&chr, &count)| (chr, *ends.get(&chr).unwrap_or(&0).max(&count)))
.collect();
// For obtaining the min and max character counts the character doesn't matter so can just use
// [`Itertools::minmax`] directly on the values, without the more complex mapping
// needed in [`into_count_by`].
let (&min, &max) = counts
.values()
.minmax()
.into_option()
.expect("Not enough chars");
(counts, max - min)
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use crate::day_14::{
intersperse, into_pair_counts, iterate, parse_input, polymer_length, summarise,
};
use std::collections::HashMap;
fn sample_input() -> String {
"NNCB
CH -> B
HH -> N
CB -> H
NH -> C
HB -> C
HC -> B
HN -> C
NN -> C
BH -> H
NC -> B
NB -> B
BN -> B
BB -> N
BC -> B
CC -> N
CN -> C"
.to_string()
}
#[test]
fn can_parse() {
let (seed, mapping) = parse_input(&sample_input());
assert_eq!(
seed,
HashMap::from([(('N', 'N'), 1), (('N', 'C'), 1), (('C', 'B'), 1),])
);
assert_eq!(
mapping,
HashMap::from([
(('C', 'H'), vec![('C', 'B'), ('B', 'H')]),
(('H', 'H'), vec![('H', 'N'), ('N', 'H')]),
(('C', 'B'), vec![('C', 'H'), ('H', 'B')]),
(('N', 'H'), vec![('N', 'C'), ('C', 'H')]),
(('H', 'B'), vec![('H', 'C'), ('C', 'B')]),
(('H', 'C'), vec![('H', 'B'), ('B', 'C')]),
(('H', 'N'), vec![('H', 'C'), ('C', 'N')]),
(('N', 'N'), vec![('N', 'C'), ('C', 'N')]),
(('B', 'H'), vec![('B', 'H'), ('H', 'H')]),
(('N', 'C'), vec![('N', 'B'), ('B', 'C')]),
(('N', 'B'), vec![('N', 'B'), ('B', 'B')]),
(('B', 'N'), vec![('B', 'B'), ('B', 'N')]),
(('B', 'B'), vec![('B', 'N'), ('N', 'B')]),
(('B', 'C'), vec![('B', 'B'), ('B', 'C')]),
(('C', 'C'), vec![('C', 'N'), ('N', 'C')]),
(('C', 'N'), vec![('C', 'C'), ('C', 'N')]),
])
);
}
#[test]
fn can_intersperse() {
let (seed_counts, mapping) = parse_input(&sample_input());
let pass_1 = intersperse(&seed_counts, &mapping);
let pass_2 = intersperse(&pass_1, &mapping);
let pass_3 = intersperse(&pass_2, &mapping);
let pass_4 = intersperse(&pass_3, &mapping);
let expected_1 = into_pair_counts(&"NCNBCHB".chars().collect());
let expected_2 = into_pair_counts(&"NBCCNBBBCBHCB".chars().collect());
let expected_3 = into_pair_counts(&"NBBBCNCCNBBNBNBBCHBHHBCHB".chars().collect());
let expected_4 = into_pair_counts(
&"NBBNBNBBCCNBCNCCNBBNBBNBBBNBBNBBCBHCBHHNHCBBCBHCB"
.chars()
.collect(),
);
assert_eq!(pass_1, expected_1);
assert_eq!(pass_2, expected_2);
assert_eq!(pass_3, expected_3);
assert_eq!(pass_4, expected_4);
}
#[test]
fn can_iterate() {
let (seed, mapping) = parse_input(&sample_input());
assert_eq!(polymer_length(&iterate(&seed, 5, &mapping)), 97);
assert_eq!(polymer_length(&iterate(&seed, 10, &mapping)), 3073);
}
#[test]
fn can_summarise() {
let (seed, mapping) = parse_input(&sample_input());
let polymer = iterate(&seed, 10, &mapping);
let summary = summarise(&polymer);
assert_eq!(
summary,
(
HashMap::from([('B', 1749), ('C', 298), ('H', 161), ('N', 865)]),
1588
)
);
let polymer2 = iterate(&polymer, 30, &mapping);
let (counts, result) = summarise(&polymer2);
assert_eq!(counts.get(&'B'), Some(&2192039569602));
assert_eq!(counts.get(&'H'), Some(&3849876073));
assert_eq!(result, 2188189693529);
}
}
